This also allows you to get up quickly after the tackle is made. Also, don't wait for a player to run into you. It will hurt less and it keeps you on your toes as well incase they decide to dummy or fake.
I dont know where you are from but if it is Europe just watch munster videos and Peter Stringer in general he is quite small but is still one of the best scrum halfs going.
If you tackle low it does not matter the size of the opponent they will fall this eliminates the need for aggression. Lets see, physc yourself out before a game, hate your opisition and any moment you get the oppertunity to tackle grit your teeth and throw self at them, the more intent to hurt them within the rules of rugby the more effective the tackle is and aim low!!! Always make sure your head outside the body of the player you tackle, and always aim low, like aiming for the shinbone.
Finally ask a veteran player than you to help you. First off gregan isn't retired he plays for Toulon in france. Tackle low and don't be afraid of hurting yourself because if you are your more likely to hurt yourself. If your team counts on a scrum half to make tackles then they must suck. No gregan is retired and you should be looking at people outside your position like 8 and wing or any other position.
Related Questions What is rugby??????? How can i become more aggressive for Football? Why can't girls play? How can i become a better number 8? Answer Questions Why do professional Rugby Union players wear tape around their head and legs?
Do you think Warrington Wolves will win the Challenge Cup? Who is the best fly-half in rugby union at the moment? This review of these publications will analyze each on the common perception that sports impede violence and view the inverse perception that sports produce violence.
To begin with, sports are commonly believed by society as a deterrent of violence in the real world. The rigid structure that makes up organized sports combined with the common law rules of the game shared even in pick-up games is said to create a fraternal hierarchy where athletes leave confrontation on the court.
Sports that are perceived to be violent in and of themselves like football and rugby are the main arguments for those who support this theory. After a rugby match it is traditional for the hosting team to serve the opposing squad with mass quantities of food and beer as a token of hospitality to the humility of the game.
The events that take place after these games, despite possible feelings of disparity from the competitive nature of the games, are thought to be not only a measure of sportsmanship but also an exertion of pent up violence that is innate within all people. This assumption that humans are naturally violent and need to release aggression in order to not be violent in other situations is grounded in the survival of the fittest mentality; instead of the foregoing occurring in nature, it occurs on the battlefield of sport where aggression can be enforced in a controlled manner.
Moreover, current events, as displayed in the LAtimes. Winners off the Field, show that advertised violence in sports themselves is accepted.
In this article, the author severely criticizes a local Toronto politician for demonizing the Toronto Argonauts recent advertising campaign.
Conversely, many people, like the politician above, believe that sports are sending the wrong messages about violence by teaching continuous habits of violence and enforcing social norms that promote bullying. This ideal suggests that it is against human nature to act violently because human beings have survived this long by diverging from their animalistic instincts in an attempt to preserve our species.
The article in the International Journal of Sports Policy finds a large number of studies that suggest sports participation encourages violence. Moreover, violence in sports can appear to transfer to real life situations when simply take out of context. The Politician noted in the LAtimes.